TEAM
SPIRIT - Killing Time (Vice Records)
Some years ago, my brother said something in passing that
really stuck with me. After listening to the second Raconteurs
album Consolers of the Lonely, he was quick to remark
on how long it had been since he had listened to a good, straight-ahead
rock record, and that he had “really needed it.”
In spite of the flooded market of modern guitar music, his
sentiment made clear to me how few of these types of records
really come around when you need them. At any given moment,
it seems that the good are seldom straight forward and the
straight forward are seldom good. So when the two coalesce
in the center, even in the slightest, we are given great cause
to rejoice.
Enter our newest golden boy, Killing Time, the
full length follow-up to Team Spirits’ self-titled
powerhouse EP/ collection of labia-strewn animated stoner
shorts (like this one.)
The record is exactly what you would expect to follow
the endlessly palatable debut, as the formula seems to have
remained the same, although the fader marked ‘feelings’
may have been nudged up a tad. Following their cavalier
anthems about religion and beach visits, a la every Wavves
song since 2010, Killing Time takes a more classic
approach to songwriting, leaning heavily on the tried and
true pop music fuel of romance and the notion of satisfaction
itself.
Although a first-listen can reveal that the bulk of the
material is about diverse topics like wanting to have a
good time, liking girls, loving girls, and loving girls
better than you have loved them prior to penning said song,
it is clear that there is a Cobain style theory of melody
first and lyrics second. It is immediately apparent that
the majority of verbal effort has been put to transforming
each track into as much of an ear worm as the one before
it.
Similarly, the sound of this record avoids any curve balls.
The production is unwaveringly professional but never unexpected.
The guitars, bass, and drums are never out of perfect syncopation,
and the showcase arrangement is keen on stopping on a dime.
The guitars and harmonies are all crisp, clean, and classic,
and as a result, sucker punch power pop tracks like the
single Teenage Heart come out of the speakers as perfectly
as any song ever could. Does the ear-worm vocal hook, “Aye-ee-yae-ee-yae”
also show up three or four more times on similarly blissful
tracks like Surrender or Closer? Sure, but only because
they know it works for them.
But as a Brooklyn band, it does seem peculiar that they
would remain unabashedly dedicated to such a slick and upbeat
sound. For example, the track "Cool Guy" opens
with a gritty strut, the likes of which would sound at home
on any early Joan Jett record. But before the groove can
really settle in, Team Spirit can’t help drenching
their dirty work in major-key saccharine syrup before the
end of each chorus. The second any grit shows up, it's a
matter of seconds before it gets shellacked over with a
sugar bomb hook. Killing Time could have been effortlessly
rearranged to pander more to Bushwick sensibilities by haphazardly
throwing around a few tambourines, adding some anemic surf
guitars, turning off their metronome and adding, say, 200%
more reverb.
At a certain point, the sound of the record shifts from
a solely aesthetic choice to a nearly-political statement.
It is everything a Brooklyn band shouldn’t be in 2014,
similar to what was said of The Hold Steady in 2006. It
chose to daringly follow in the tradition of Lynott or Ocasek
in the face of myriad pressures to conform to that of Marr
and Malkmus.
But is catchy enough? Is fun enough? Is
the purity of major-key power chord bliss worth the forfeit
of thematic complexity or sonic experimentation? Can a band
that has no intention of challenging the preconceived parameters
of “rock and roll” be considered great so long
as they excel within said parameters quite spectacularly?
Can an artistically boring band be a classic band? The argument
boils down, and bare with me here, to whether or not Cheap
Trick is a good band. (Does this photo of my Halloween costume
bias the question entirely?)
In Color came out at a watershed moment for American
music, bringing little to the table aside from pop serenity
and guitar chops, and yet it still stands as an undeniable
classic. In 1977, Dave Marsh’s Rolling Stone review
of the album opened with the harsh yet undeniable sentence,
“There’s nothing progressive about In Color.”
Of course, he ultimately conceded to the undeniable charm
and sheer enjoyability of the record in the same paragraph,
but he had made a crucial point. At least in 1977, an uninteresting
album could still be considered great, so long as it could
truly stand on its own. And while Killing Time
may not be a hotbed of allusion and erudition lyrically
speaking, Marsh’s remarks on In Color circa
’77 reinforce the notion that great melody can make
up for even the most hackneyed and vague stanzas. I found
one of the greatest parallels between these two generation-spanning
acts to be encased in Marsh’s pertinent observation:
“[Cheap Trick’s] excellent, tough harmonies
are used instrumentally, rather than verbally; I’ve
heard these songs 40 times and have no idea what the subject
matter of any of them might be.” This is the magic
of bands like Team Spirit. I don’t know what the ramifications
of having a ‘teenage heart’ would have on my
relationship. I would never be caught dead telling someone
that ‘I’ve got a case of the growing pains.’
But some works are so warm sounding and effortlessly anthemic
that they instantly become relatable.
This album aims for fun. It aims for palatable. It never
aims to challenge. When all is said and done, we need to
accept and critique the record on the terms it lays down
for itself. With that in mind, can we in good conscience
fault it for failing to achieve goals it never set out to
meet? We all know that Team Spirit’s Killing Time
is not the thinking man’s rock and roll, but most
importantly, Team Spirit knows it too, and they proudly
wield that sentiment like a katana. Or, rather, like a Flying
V.
God save the good and the straight forward. Hail, hail
rock n’ roll.
PUJOL
– Kludge (Saddle Creek)
Okay, blind taste test on this first track, “Judas
Booth:” Surely you’ve been coerced into a Pepsi
Challenge or two in your day in exchange for a free t-shirt
or something of the like. You know the drill, but this time,
you won’t wind up on a mailing list or leaving with
a free Baja Blast hoodie. Just come over here for a second,
put this on over your eyes, put these on over your ears,
and take a listen. What do you hear? Some Jeff Lyne vocals
and gated snare? Some Eno-esque soundscapes? Some arrangements
that would lend themselves to Gene Simmons gallivanting
around a stage atop a flurry of syncopated pyro-technics?
I said the same thing. Now take the blindfold off. See?!?
Its a just a dude playing at Death By Audio in a grey sweatshirt
and a half-beard. Where is the glitter? The heels?
Don’t worry, he follows the first song with an aggressive
return to Pujol-form with “Manufactured Crisis Control.”
The chorus belts out, “The old me and the new me are
in a fist fight,” in an Andrew WK crescendo-gasm of
thundering drum hits and strum patterns that simply don’t
let up from verse to verse. In fact, the track only intensifies
as it progresses. It’s not unlike listening to the
song have its own panic attack as it devolves into something
resembling an Adolescents album skipping in a CD player
(listen to it, it’s pretty crazy). Nevertheless, the
song returns to the verse, remaining doggedly melodic in
the face of all the frenetic arrangement, only to once again
revert back to the jerky CD-like hits. Once you give your
early Aughts Walkman a hearty slap, the skipping should
give way to track three.
“Without even knowing it, you’ve drifted into
a…” a recorded 50’s VO attempts to warble
out of the track “Pitch Black” before getting
cut off by Daniel Pujol’s ceaselessly crunchy Telecaster
chords. When it comes to cute intros and auxiliary sound
clips, ya gotta go all or nothing, man, and Pujol has unswervingly
opted for a clear and confident ‘all.’ Recording
gags, contorted static, extraneous noise beds, and general
sonic miscellany are scattered all over Kludge
from start to finish, mostly situating themselves at the
beginning and end of each track. In a recent interview with
Vice, Pujol commented on the heightened reality and cultural
abstraction of the record, stating, “I wanted to make
an album that sounded completely fictional. Like a cartoon
nightmare; a tiny wind-up orchestra.” The overall
effect transforms Kludge into something of a listenable
MAD Magazine; ephemeral but not disposable, edifying but
not informative, outrageously silly but still serious as
a heart attack.
Which brings us to back to “Pitch Black,” the
slam-dunk snare-hit mega-song of the album. I can’t
say that it is the heaviest song on Kludge, nor
the catchiest, or even the best, but I can say that it takes
on the chief dilemmas of our times with a dutiful sense
of focus and an unwavering earnestness that doesn’t
fall back on metaphor or hyperbole. “Well there’s
only one place on the planet left where it’s okay
to turn off your phone,” he euphoniously growls in
reference to the outlandish role that movie theaters play
in 21st Century living. There are few other acts who would
have the balls to put such blatant cultural indictments
in pop songs. Knowing that a Pitchfork decimal grade was
waiting for them at their release date would be enough to
dissuade most greased-hair garagers from simply stating,
“Well, we’re living in a very public world.”
I am not saying that Pujol has earned himself a post as
a columnist for the Atlantic; rather, I simply champion
this song in accordance to the classic Orwell quote, “We
have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the
obvious is the first duty of intelligent men.” Restatement
it may be, but “Pitch Black” rings true while
Pujol’s fuzzed-out contemporaries stand silent in
the realm of cultural commentary. Bravo.
The following track, “Circles,” pushes the tempo
up a few notches and adds to the cartoon orchestra feel
with some spiraling guitar leads and Ritalined-up tambourine
tracks. “Circles” and countless songs like it
on Kludge, in conjunction with the ‘cartoon orchestra’
sentiment, make the record feel like something that was
made only by Pujol with the aid of a dozen of the little
blue animated birds from Cinderella — their beaks
all smeared with cheap blow, each frantically pushing faders
and twisting knobs in the mixing process.
But still on a high from “Circles,” just before
we explode from the breakneck pace of the record, he slips
in “Dark Haired Suitor,” an answer to the question
of whether or not he could live with any negative space
on the sonic palate of the album. With a charming thrift
store guitar tone and a thin rasp of a voice (in comparison
to the layered snarl of the rest of the album), he proves
himself to be a capable artist and songsmith in any environment
he places himself in.
Which moves us to track seven: Perhaps I spoke too soon.
In stark contrast, the song “Sacred Harp BFK”
is as genuinely bad and abrasive as the rest of the record
is just plain fantastic. I mean, it sounds like it was fun
to record but… goddamn, is it tough to listen to.
That’s really all I can say there, aside from commenting
on how headache inducing the bass is. The record as a whole
is wonderfully composed, performed, and produced, but I
suppose Pujol reserves the right to subvert any of these
expectations for at least one track.
Through the raucous buzz-stomp of “No Words,”
the sparse freak folk tune “Spooky Scary,” and
the Ableton Live meets old FAO Schwartz clock track “Small
World,” Pujol keeps us reeled in until he lays down
the final incisive blow of “Youniverse.” While
there is an obvious three minute transgression from the
dependable quality of Pujol’s entire career at the
center of this album, Kludge stands as a nearly
perfect modern rock record, combining timely cultural discourse,
religious quandary, emotional unrest, and, of course, a
healthy dose of nonsense. I haven’t heard anything
in recent memory that seems to flawlessly combine the ideological
realms of “Crust Punk Summer Camp Sing-a-Long”
and “Lost Soundtrack to Mr. Magorium’s Wonder
Emporium Feat. ELO.” But I suppose Pujol has always
been pretty unrivaled in that field.
HOWLER
– World of Joy (Rough Trade)
Bear with me on this one--there's a lot I'm trying to accomplish
here. I'm reviewing a record, sure, but I'm also trying
to make you, the reader, understand my generation.
That's a big pill to swallow, I know, but we're dealing
with a record made by someone my age, so I figure this is
as good an opportunity as any to be your millennial ambassador.
I would love to pull you into my world for a few minutes,
on a journey of apathy, anarchy, "getting it,"
"gif.-ing it," self-doubt, self-importance, selfie-doubt,
selfie-importance, that one show Skins that was cool for
a while, fear, loathing, and iOS7.
From my time spent among the peoples of the Millennia, it
seems that much of our cultural discourse revolves around
finding a work of art to be either "cool" or "whatever."
Many of my generation use the strain of Millenial dialect
that would attach the article "like" to the latter
of these qualifiers, and in that circumstance, "like"
is a placeholder that means, "You understand what I'm
talking about because we were both born after Reagan left
office. In the spirit of brevity let's not clutter this
with cumbersome adjectives. All hail Cyrus."
Knowing this, I'll break down Howler's new LP World
of Joy, track-by-track, utilizing these two systems
of ranking. A song will either be graded (by me, a Millennial)
"whatever," or "it's cool." In rare
and astonishing cases, a single track could be an amalgam
of the two. Both terms will stand as qualifying scores that
will judge the tonal intention of the content as well as
how good I think the song is. But be careful, as positive
and negative connotations are not mutually exclusive to
"whatever" or "it's cool"; if I say
something is "whatever," I could be saying that
it kinda blows, I could be accusing it of being too dismissive,
or being some kind of faux-fashionable charade, or maybe
I'm just saying that it's really good at being "whatever."
In the same manner, "cool" could mean that I think
the track is highly enjoyable, or that I disapprove of its
overt embrace of a guitar tone that is far too pastiche
to be compelling in any way, or that maybe they're all just
trying too hard. For that is the ceaseless beauty of the
Millennial language: in opposition to the foundation of
nearly all forms of human communication, words need not
remain bound to definitions.
Cause, you know, we don't like labels. Don't put our words
in a box, man.
Alright, X-ers, Baby-Boomers and the like. Let us begin:
1. "Al's Corral" - Whatever.
The first chorus on this record: "I won't say yes,
but I might say maybe"
It's ridiculous and caricaturesque in nature, and it's
a complete overexertion of our generational issues as non-committal
semi-adults, but the satire is coming from someone who shrugs
and eye rolls his way through every interview he's involved
in. I was tempted to give this track a "whatever, bro"
just from the lyrical content alone, but it is a rollicking
start to the record, and the new tonal direction of the
band is refreshing.
2. "Drip" - It's Cool.
Lets see here… guitar sound effects that emulate
lyrical content, a sonic approach to structure, and lyrical
cadence that borrows from old style rock and roll while
paying homage to surf aesthetics, while…waging a cultural
critique against the shortcomings of your own lifestyle
as well as the powers that be within the world of musicianship.
Well, I hate to say it, but these are all signs of caring
in some form. Rather unmillenial of them, but I'm gonna
give these guys an "its cool" for referencing
artistic forbearers in a tasteful manner, having a set of
somewhat pointed and directional lyrics, and for just trying
to do things. To put it succinctly, I gave it an "its
cool" because there is a distinct lack of "whatever"
in this track. The ideal millennial doesn't think stuff,
like things, or do anything except be cool or whatever,
you know? Its like, "Cool reverb, bro."
3. "Don't Wanna" - Whatever, It's Cool.
As I said earlier, to pen a song that is a crystalline
blend of the two qualifying terms provided is an incredible
accomplishment; one that should not be overlooked. Not only
is this the song where the aesthetics of the band hit their
stride in full, but the song effortlessly glides into the
realm that can only be described as anthemic. What really
works here is the nature of the millennial attitude that
gets channelled- there is no spite, no malice, no inconvenience
to others. Whereas "I might say maybe," from the
first falls short of a polished example of Westerbergian
word play, and comes across as a verbal eye roll, here we
find the opposite polar end of the record, not but two songs
later. "You don't even have to be a punk if you don't
want to." It takes true songwriting craftsmanship to
enable such verbal simplicity to possess such an incredible
level of functionality. "If you don't want to."
Four words carry the weight of the entire song; an entire
people. My people. We're directionless societal drains,
but we finally have an anthem.
"Don't Wanna" is a part of something much bigger
than itself, as it has joined the ranks of the elusive and
mysterious works that perfectly convey the dichotomy of
the simple three or four chord anthem, which is:
A: Repetitive three or four chord songs are easy. This
is true.
B: If you know these chords, which are very easy, you too
can make a song as good as this one someday. This is a lie.
"Don't Wanna" is where Howler take leaps and
bounds away from just being a verbed-out buzz-band and briefly
align themselves with the storied lineage of the best liars
in the industry- the Zimmermans, the Pettys, the Cuomos:
rockstars and writers who can convince their audience that
the perfection of their own Billboard 100 3-chord songs
are somehow comparable to those made by civilians, simply
because they come from the same simplistic tri-chord soil.
What I mean to say here is that this song is a month-old
classic, and it takes true skill to compose a classic. Succinctly
put: "Don't Wanna" is the simplest song that you
could never write.
It's a single melodic shrug, a tremendous one, and it might
just be the millennial "All You Need is Love."
Whatever. It's cool.
4. "Yacht Boys" - "Whatever"
Meets, "Pfft, Whatever," which actually amounts
to, "it's cool," somehow.
The chorus: "Too busy choking on my medicine, but,
lord, haven't you heard that nothing ever happens…
not ever." Then the fuzzed out Dick Dale lead riff.
Yacht Boys is a hook stuffed number that addresses both
class difference and personal indifference- the bread and
butter of the mic'd millennial, and Howler nails it on this
one as well.
5. "In the Red" - "Yeah, it's cool,
but whatever."
The start stop showmanship of the first LP is present in
spades on tracks like this one, although the glittering
angles have been replaced with the garbage disposal grumble
of some grungier guitars played in bouncy strum patterns.
The finer points of the record come from shimmering chorus,
12 strings, and Rickenbacker pickups; some real REM type
stuff.
Well, bringing this up might be shooting dirty pool in
a review penned by a self-proclaimed chill dude or whatever,
but I suppose it's as good a time as any to raise it as
a point of discussion.
A black Rickenbacker (like this one) and an orange Fender
offset guitar (like this one) have become part of the band's
main touring rigs now- and I have to say that its all very
oedipal… or is it Freudian? Who knows? Because, you
know, cause he's dating the daughter of the guitarist from
that band with the feelings and the Morrisseys. I mean,
my girlfriend's dad builds motorcycles, really cool ones,
and I think that's awesome, but I'm not going to start rebuilding
old café racers in my garage if only for the reason
that I believe modern romance is enough of a Freudian minefield
as-is.
But as we bring ourselves back to the record, and as I
switch from catty gossip-blog columnist back to almost-semi-respectable
amateur music critic/ millennial linguist and behavioral
analyst, it's clear that In The Red is one of the finest
Howler tunes released to date. I mean, it's no Don't Wanna,
but it's still great. That's another thing we do by the
way, we rank shit. Did you ask us to rank anything? Does
it help that we rank everything? Don't start asking questions,
we'll rank you in something so fast that you won't even
know what happened. Like these guys. And thats how we treat
our wildlife. Just think how brutal your compartmentalization
will be.
6. "World of Joy" - It's Cool, 'Cause
Whatever.
Extensive sarcasm: whatever. Tambourine: cool.
7. "Louise" - It's Cool
Feelings and self doubt: cool. No tambourine: whatever.
In the traditional millennial sense, there is really no
trace of "Whatever" on this track at all. Louise,
a real powerhouse anthem of adoration and insecurity might
be the most feeling and performative tumult we've seen from
this group. Grown-ups, suits, or un-chill, high-key bros
would probably give this song a high numerical or star-based
rating. I don't disagree with them, but I'll just give it
an "It's Cool."
8. "Here's the Itch that Creeps Through My Skull"
- Whatever because whatever.
It takes guts to show vulnerability and sincerity on a
rock record. It takes bravery to peel off the veneer of
apathy and bravado to reveal the human underneath. It takes
courage. It takes authenticity. Or maybe just a manager
that says, "I don't know, you should toss a slow one
on there too." Regardless, its something new from Howler,
who took the time to turn down on the last two.
However, I can't get all the way through a Howler review
without at least touching on his voice, which is, to say
the least, a strange beast. While it certainly came off
as excessive on the first few spins of their first LP America
Give Up, (there was a period where fellow Beat columnist
Layne Montgomery and I used to do extensive imitations of
his broken croon on drinking outings; almost as much as
we did Elvis Costello) his signature inflection seems to
have come into its own on this record, fluctuating between
roaring grit and cool disdain within the span of a single
line. Having said all that, there is a truly disarming vocal
tone on the track, and you see behind the curtain and hear
someone who, not that long ago, was only seventeen. Millenials
don't acknowledge their pasts. Except on the holy Throw
Back Thursday.
I was gonna give it a whatever, straight up, but then I
pictured how cool everyone would look when swaying to this
song live.Like this. Aw, fucking christ do we love our gifs.
9. "Indictment" - Whatever, Bro
YouTube ads. Whatever.
10. "Aphorismic Wasteland Blues" - It's
Like, You Know?
Tambourine. So whatever, it's almost cool.
SKATERS - Manhattan (Warner Bros.)
by Pete Kilpin
Manhattan: A Great Record with a Bad Title by a Band that
is Scared of Doctors
I've
been talking a lot about this band for a while now. A bunch
of people have been, but mainly in two different manners.
The first of which can be encapsulated in their VICE revlurb:
“Oh, you formed a budget Strokes clone and you named
your major-label debut Manhattan? That's cool.
Here's a message from everyone in Brooklyn: Eat a dick,
you fake fucks.”
The second is something like, “Oh. Yeah. They're
the best.” After seeing them a handful of times and
already wearing out their first record, I can say I'm leaning
much closer to the second opinion.
I do feel for the guys having to endure the ceaseless comparisons
to Les Strokes. It's a damn shame that the sultans of the
new/old guard Manhattan-style cool are still the only point
in literacy for the music press to talk about accessible
modern rock, but sometimes journalism is hard, I guess.
But I also have to admit, they had it comin' in some aspects.
They run in the same circles, stomp the same ground, arrange
their instrumentation in a pretty similar way, and their
guitarist was playing a Nick Valensi signature model for
the first couple shows I saw. I mean, come on guys. Cover
your tracks on that one.
Regardless, frontman Michael Cummings has proven himself
an incredible songsmith on Manhattan. The record
is as exhilarating as it is plainly enjoyable, and there
is something truly essential about each song in the mix.
Any complaining about the album is largely removed from
the first or second listen, as the striking soundscapes
and deft pop composure keep the listener engaged from start
to finish, save a couple lulling Jamaican dance-hall numbers.
Not to say those super-mod groove tracks suffer from a dive
in quality either, but they lack the sense of immediacy
that the other numbers provide. For instance, the song 'Fear
of the Knife' meanders a bit, but they won me over with
their paralyzing fear of doctors' offices. As they used
to say on American Bandstand, “It's got a
good beat, it's got lyrics that critique western medical
industrial complex, and I can dance to it.”
Following the urgency and rapid fire down-stroke guitars
of the opening track, “One of Us,” an ode to
the band's new island-playground, I did find myself worrying
that I had stumbled into an album solely comprised of two-guitar
arrangements supporting firsthand accounts of Baudelarian
urban leisure;, but I can tell you now, it isn't JUST that.
It's a lot of that, but not just that. And as a lazy album
reviewer, I can say that, like The Strokes before them,
their lyrical strengths stem more from their emotional travails
than from their roles as tireless urbanites (give me 'You
Talk Way Too Much' over '12:51' any day).
The band has been very vocal about citing classic art-rock
bands like the Clash as influences, and they seem to have
a profound impact on the carefully curated aesthetics of
the band, but their sonic life-blood seems to be something
far less abrasive than they're willing to let on. Their
unabashed relationships to sweet melodies and focused guitar
parts seem to conjure memories of late 90's guitar groups
with widespread ambition. To put it bluntly, the glossiest
parts of Manhattan feel a little closer to the band Fastball
than they are to P.I.L. Is that an uncool comparison? Absolutely,
but Skaters aren't trying to challenge your perception of
marginally aggressive, major-key pop music, they're simply
challenging the mode of its presentation.
The compound result of their collective production choices
has taken what could have been a straight-forward, major-label
rock record, and turned it into an intentionally disjointed
collection of distorted stems. They wanted the record to
have a DIY hip-hop feel, as though it were constructed entirely
from samples, and the final product was quite successful
in that regard. “Nice Hat” is a fantastic and
frenetic hardcore song, presumably about their major-label
blues, that sounds like someone sliced up half a dozen Husker
Dü songs into one cohesive track. Of course, you can't
ignore the irony that this process of lo-fi-ification was
achieved with the aid of some of the most expensive outboard
gear on the planet, but again, the fact that the record
sounds so good heals all its own wounds. The hook on 'Miss
Teen Mass.' is so huge that we'd be listening even if they
didn't smother it in eBay drum machines. The songs are strong
enough prior to their deconstruction that they shine through
in spite of their veils of experimental plasticity. The
same goes for all their big ones, 'Deadbolt', 'I Wanna Dance',
and 'Schemers', each as breathlessly exciting as the last,
even with every ounce of skewed studio slickness.
The album is also laced with field recordings of their time
on the town to give it a more geographically-bound feel,
but the overwhelming sense of place is already established
by the songs themselves. Tracks like 'Symptomatic' were
meant to be heard bleeding through the brick walls of Bowery
basements, with the band's volume rising and falling as
each showgoer opens a back door for a quick cigarette. These
tunes couldn't be from anywhere else but Manhattan. So when
the “Please stand clear” voice of the NYC subway
system opens the album, it already feels like overkill.
Nothing superfluous ever really kills the flow of the record,
they just sometimes distract from the great content at its
core.
Admittedly, some of their strays into social commentary
are a bit peculiar. The satirical yet underhandedly anthemic
'To Be Young' strives for Randy Newman-esque subversion
but falls short under the greater banner of the album. To
be a major-chord Bowery Ballroom band critiquing the socialite
elite is a bit like making fun of the cool kids sitting
at the other end of the cool kids table, but I'll be goddamned
if the song isn't catchy as all hell.
So sure, there are some bones to pick with this record,
but strangely, most of these issues are negated simply by
being encased in truly great songs. Nit-picking aside, Manhattan
is one of the most exciting debuts I've heard in a very
long time. So, as a Brooklynite, I would love to extend
an olive branch, one borough to another. It's not an unprecedented
record or a cutting-edge record, its just a great one. And
if making great records is cause for Brooklyn to tell you
to eat a dick, well then, to Skaters, I still say: Eat a
dick you fake fucks, because the next round is on me.
“3 Reviews of Goodman's Isn't It Sad,”
or
“The Problems of Knowing the Dude You're Reviewing”
by Pete Kilpin
If you're reading this, you already know that Jersey
Beat didn't make its name just by covering the shimmering
crazes or major label ephemera that have been hurled our
way over the last thirty years. Surely, you understand that
this opposition to the tendencies of the main stream music
press is a cornerstone of its mission statement, and, OF
COURSE, you know that Jersey Beat's ability to
become embedded into the fabric of movements, subcultures,
and scenes is its main source continued vitality. Of course
you knew all that. You're reading Jersey Beat.
Having said all that, its also well-known that Jersey
Beat operates with a tremendous amount of objectivity
and professionalism when it comes to its particular brand
of music criticism. However, when writing for a decidedly
"front-lines" institution like Jersey Beat
(can I just call it 'The Beat' or should I say 'Jersey Beat'
every time? I don't know, I'm new here,) the reviewer can
often become so entrenched in the scene or in the personal
lives of the bands that he or she is reviewing that biased
impartiality can inevitably enter into the picture. Many
find that this element can bring an enriching and fresh
perspective into the art of music criticism, while others
can find it irksome and unprofessional. I'm not here to
say that I prefer one to the other, or to pledge my allegiance
to a single methodology, rather, I'm simply going to take
advantage of the fact that I have a choice: If I find myself
reviewing a record made by someone I know personally, should
I do so with detached professionalism, or should I let my
sense of kinship and predilection run wild across the page?
Take my friend and Mama Coco's label-mate Goodman's new
record Isn't It Sad. I'd love to review it impartially,
but I simply can't. I hang out with him all the time, he
drunkenly emcees our band's shows without being asked, I've
known the record's producer for years, and my brother just
bought a guitar from the guy who mastered it.
On top of all that, last night, I saw Goodman at a party
and he told me, "You know, when we were in the studio,
if I was ever unsure about something, Oliver [veteran record
producer and novice human producer] would say to me, 'Just
imagine, like, Peter Kilpin listening to it…' and
we'd kinda shape something around that…" Obviously,
it doesn't get less impartial than that, as I am, literally
and individually speaking, the target audience.
And finally, as though I couldn't illustrate how inseparable
this record is to my personal life thoroughly enough, Goodman
ruined the premiere of House of Cards for me last
week by giving away the ending. But I can't put all of that
into a cohesive review. On one hand, I can't fairly review
the record because it was literally made for me. On the
other hand, I can't fairly review the record because Goodman
is also an asshole. So seeing that this record can't be
professionally compartmentalized in isolation from my personal
life, I'll have to go about it in a different way.
I'll attempt to review it in three distinct and separate
manners. The first: an entirely impartial review. The second:
an intimate and inevitably biased review that takes our
personal relationship into account. The third: a spiteful
and emotionally charged review of his record, seen as a
worthless product made by someone who ruins the biggest
plot twist in the entire series of House of Cards
just because he thought it would be soooooo fucking
funny to put it on his Facebook.
The Impartial Review:
NY-based-pop-craftsman/solo-singer-songwriter Goodman's
sophomore album, Isn't It Sad," begins in
the same way that his first one did. Seconds after hitting
play, something incredibly familiar oozes out of the speakers:
Airy room tones, palm-muted power-chord plucks, and a faint
wash of organesque polyphonic reverb. Perhaps it's not as
sinister as this, but Goodman seems like an artist who knows
a thing or two about branding. He has a reputation for being
pretty particular about his guitar sound coming across in
a recognizable way, and he doesn't let a lot of his tonal
characteristics, vocals, drums, or otherwise, change too
drastically from track to track. He wants a Goodman record
to sound like a Goodman record.
And just like a Goodman record, it takes a moment before
it barrels out of the gate on its title track, utilizing
a bouncy rhythm section, and a razor-sharp set of stacked
vocals in each refrain. He knows what tools need to be pulled
out of the drawer to make a seamless power-pop record. Perhaps
he read the comment cards on the first record and returned
intent on making minor, but noticeable, changes in his form.
His use of melody and language are more engaging and interesting
than ever before, just as his vocal technique appears to
have advanced ten-fold. Each song structure is perfectly
suited to showcase his harmonic dexterity, giving his masterfully
controlled squeak ample space to leap from one octave to
the next without breaking a sweat.
The record also seems to be an exercise in restraint, perhaps
for the good of his persona. The songs never give you what
you want right away. They make you wait for the full-energy
choruses or raucous verses, and even then, the guitars always
stay clean, leaving you aching for a touch of aggression,
be it a distortion pedal, a gritty organ part – something.
Similarly, the album never gets cluttered. Songs like "Anywhere"
take special care to never confuse a melody. You won't likely
find any hidden guitar parts on future rotations. Everything
that needs to be heard gets heard.
The lyrics are unmistakably pop, and exist within a storied
lineage of boy-loves-girl, boy-hates-girl, boy-hates-self,
boy-loves-hating self, etc. I mean to say that, on first
listen, the lyrics have to come across as clever before
they can concede to the painful emotions or ideas that lie
beneath them. The resounding sentimental truths in the first
verse of "Blue Eyed Girl" are all sitting there,
but only after you think "that was a great rhyme,"
to yourself a couple of times. There are, however, a few
exceptions, where he ventures into more conceptually ambitious
territory on songs like "This is Our Youth" and
"Like What They Like," turning a critical eye
to the city's nebulous cultural landscape while attempting
to sketch out his own piece of the puzzle.
The enjoyment and accessibility gleaned from the composition,
production, and performance of these songs make them feel
like the product of a true pop aficionado; the Jason Faulkners
and Adam Schlesingers of the world. There is something effortless
about his creations, but no less enjoyable than any other
song. Goodman, something like a late-night staff writer,
seems to have written a thousand of these things, and went
with the good ones. Like any great pop song, they feel as
disposable as they do classic.
The Personal Review:
There's this guy I know, Goodman, and he just made a record.
It's great. Don't let the cover weird you out. It's not
all that different to his last one either, it has the same
guitar sound, drum sound, Oliver is producing it again,
it's the whole nine. Word on the street is that he's pretty
anal about his vocal takes, which are, you know, always
great, but it takes a lot of energy to get them perfect.
He's also really particular about making sure Zac Coe is
always doing that same "Boom BAP BAP- Boom BAP- Boom
BAP BAP" drum pattern thing on almost every song. It's
like, he knows who he is and he wants you to know too. I
mean, He's had the same haircut for I don't know how long,
and he's got that jacket that he always wears...same with
the scarf. Could be 90 degrees he'd still have a scarf.
Buddy of mine saw him wear it at the beach once. It's like
he's trying to brand himself or something.
So here's the weird part. Goodman came up to me at a party
the other night, and he was like, "Yeah, we would talk
about you listening to the record when we were making it…"
or something like that. So, does that mean that it was made
for me? If I don't like it then does that mean they failed
in making their record? If I don't like how the acoustic
guitar sounded; does that mean that they failed at recording
those guitars? I don't know. That's heavy. I don't know,
the lyrics are kind of a bummer sometimes. But it's cool.
The record is cool. He's a funny guy too, but like, pretty
much mainly on the Internet.
The Reactionary Review:
Figures you'd have a picture of yourself on the cover
of your record, you stupid ass hat. I'm gonna choke you
with your stupid fucking scarf. Isn't it sad? Yeah. Yeah
it's pretty fucking sad that I don't get to experience the
season fucking premiere of House of Cards the way
everyone else got to. Last week I heard my roommate watching
it and then he was like, "OH MY GOD. THATS CRAZY"
and I was like, "What?!?" and he was like, "You'll
see, man." I couldn't wait, Goodman, I couldn't fucking
wait. But that night, it all went south.
I went on Facebook, and scrolled through my news feed. And
what did I see? "RIP Zoe Barnes #HouseOfCards."
He just said it. Without an ounce of remorse. What kind
of monster does that? What kind of morally void scum sucking
bottom feeder bowlcut goon face weasel says something like
that as though they couldn't imagine anyone caring that
much about anything ever GODDAMMIT GOODMAN HAVEN'T YOU EVER
FELT LOVE? OR COMPASSION? Is there a bowl ut around your
heart keeping you from letting anyone in, or get too close?
Why would you hurt so many people like that? They were people
you loved and who loved you, I read the comment thread.
Zoe Barnes is dead and I didn't even get to enjoy it. You
know who did? The FUCKING PRESIDENT! He tweeted about the
show and he said NO GODDAMN SPOILERS. YOU DISOBEYED THE
MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE FREE WORLD! Do you feel like a
big man now? Fuck this fucking record. It is sad, Goodman.
It is sad.
Also I've still only seen the first episode so… no
more spoilers.
back to jerseybeat.com
l back to top
JerseyBeat.com
is an independently published music fanzine
covering punk, alternative, ska, techno and garage
music, focusing on New Jersey and the Tri-State
area. For the past 25 years, the Jersey Beat music
fanzine has been the authority on the latest upcoming
bands and a resource for all those interested in
rock and roll.
|
|
|